Perspective · AI · Human Intelligence

My Personal AI Compass

Staying human in the age of AI. A personal framework for working with AI without outsourcing what makes us human.

Adger de Boer · August 2026 · ~8 min read

I want to learn how to work with AI without losing sight of what makes my work, and me, human.

My aim is not to do as much as possible with AI.

It is to understand where AI can genuinely enhance the quality of my thinking, my work and my contribution to others.

That requires two forms of literacy, developed side by side:

AI literacy

Understanding what AI and large language models are, how they work, where they are capable and where they are not, and how to use them thoughtfully and responsibly.

Human literacy

Becoming better at listening, observing, questioning, interpreting, exercising judgement, making sense of complexity, building relationships and taking responsibility for action.

My human development is the purpose.
AI is one of the means.

My North Star

I want AI to help me:

see more clearly,
ask better questions,
think more deeply.

Not because AI has the answers for me, but because it can expand the space in which I think.

AI can help surface patterns I might otherwise overlook. It can introduce alternative perspectives, challenge assumptions and suggest connections I had not considered.

But ultimately, I decide what matters.

My fundamental AI loop

I want to work through four stages:

Human intention   →   AI exploration   →   Human discernment   →   Human action

I start with my own intention.

Then I use AI to broaden and deepen my exploration.

I apply my own judgement to what emerges — questioning what is plausible, what is missing, what is useful and what does not stand up to scrutiny.

Only then do I act.

AI can generate possibilities.
I give them meaning.

What I will, and will not, delegate

I am happy to delegate cognitive work when doing so strengthens rather than diminishes my own thinking.

I may ask AI to:

  • structure information;
  • analyse material;
  • identify patterns;
  • challenge assumptions;
  • explore alternatives;
  • connect ideas;
  • formulate hypotheses;
  • help me see a situation from a different perspective.

But I will not outsource my:

  • judgement;
  • values;
  • responsibility;
  • professional integrity;
  • human relationships;
  • contextual understanding.
My boundary
AI may challenge my thinking. It should not replace it.

AI as a lens, not an authority

I want to use AI primarily as a lens.

Not:

“AI tells me what is happening here.”

But:

“AI helps me explore what might be happening here.”

An AI-generated insight is not a conclusion. It is an invitation to look again.

A pattern is a hypothesis.

An answer is a starting point.

An unexpected response may be worth exploring precisely because it raises a better question.

The world remains the ultimate test.

My stance towards AI

I want to approach AI with curiosity and critical judgement in equal measure.

I want to experiment without becoming uncritical.

I want to explore what is possible without assuming that everything that can be automated should be automated.

Curious.
Experimental.
Critical.
Reflective.
Selective.

I do not need to chase the AI race

I do not need to keep up with every new model, feature, platform, agent or productivity trick.

The pace of change makes that both unrealistic and, in many cases, unnecessary.

What matters to me is learning to recognise:

Which developments genuinely change something about the way I work, think or contribute?

So my question is not simply:

“What is new?”

It is:

“What is significant?”

I would rather develop a small number of practices that genuinely improve my work than accumulate a growing collection of tools that merely give me more things to try.

Keeping the human measure

I do not want to optimise for maximum AI productivity.

Maximum human quality.

A tool that saves me time but diminishes my attention, curiosity or professional craft is not necessarily an improvement.

Conversely, a use of AI that helps me understand someone more deeply, recognise a pattern, ask a better question or make a wiser decision may be immensely valuable, even if it saves little or no time.

For me, that is a more meaningful measure of progress.

My question of accountability

Whenever I adopt a new way of working with AI, I want to ask:

Is AI making me better at using AI, or is it making me a better professional, coach and human being?

If the former becomes the goal, I may have lost my way.

If the latter is happening, I am probably moving in the right direction.

My compass is deliberately unfinished

This is not a final position.

It is version 0.1.

I expect it to change as I learn more, experiment, encounter limitations and discover unexpected possibilities.

I do not want to have all the answers in advance.

I want to become better at finding my way deliberately.

Not simply learning what AI can do, but continually asking what we, as human beings, consider worth doing ourselves.

An invitation to create your own AI Compass

You do not need to be an AI expert to create a personal AI Compass.

In fact, I would suggest starting somewhere else entirely.

Don't begin with:

“Which AI tools should I learn?”

Begin with:

“What kind of professional, leader, entrepreneur or human do I want to be in a world where AI can do increasingly more?”

Then ask yourself:

  • What do I want AI to enhance?
  • What do I deliberately want to keep human?
  • Which forms of judgement will I not delegate?
  • How could AI broaden my perception or deepen my thinking?
  • Which human capabilities do I want to develop rather than automate?
  • When does AI genuinely add value to my work?
  • Which developments deserve my attention?
  • What do I consciously choose not to adopt?

Your answers will begin to form your own compass.

It is not there to help you follow AI.

It is there to help you keep choosing your own direction as the landscape changes.